Inside the Zodia Solutions Ecosystem: Hypernative on why security is the foundation, not a feature

The problem: visibility gaps that legacy tools can’t close

Banks entering digital asset markets face a security challenge that is structurally different from anything their existing compliance infrastructure was built to handle.

The core issue is not that digital assets are inherently insecure. It is that the traditional compliance tooling financial institutions rely on – screening against static lists, retrospective transaction monitoring, periodic audits – was designed for a market where transactions settle in days and risk exposure accumulates slowly.

In digital asset markets, risk moves in real time. A liquidity pool that was clean yesterday may carry illicit-fund exposure today. A counterparty address that passed screening last week may be sanctions-linked this morning. An address can be engineered to look nearly identical to one an institution has transacted with before, a technique known as address poisoning, designed specifically to exploit institutional workflows.

By the time a designation lands or an exploit propagates, most institutions are already exposed. The gap is structural, and most teams do not recognise its full shape until they map their actual digital asset workflows against their existing controls and find that the controls stop well short of where the risk really lives.

What Hypernative makes possible

Hypernative is a real-time security and compliance platform built for institutions operating in digital asset markets. It monitors across the full transaction lifecycle: from pre-transaction screening and protocol risk analysis through to continuous counterparty monitoring and automated response.

For a regulated financial institution, this translates into a set of capabilities that have not previously been available at institutional grade.

Before initiating any interaction with a DeFi protocol, institutions can screen liquidity pools, to understand whether, or to what extent, a pool carries illicit-fund exposure before a transaction is initiated, not after it settles. Pre-transaction simulation reveals the true outcome of a proposed interaction, catching address poisoning attempts and blind signing risks at the point of decision rather than in post-trade review.

For compliance teams, real-time counterparty screening against OFAC sanctions lists, KYT/AML risk categories, and behavioural signals means that when an address becomes non-compliant with their internal systems and controls, it is flagged from that moment forward, not discovered in a retrospective audit weeks later. Institutions can also correlate on-chain transaction flows against off-chain systems, verifying that a transaction destination matches a registered client before approving a disbursement.

The result is a defensible security posture that institutions can demonstrate to regulators, auditors, and their own clients. And it opens up product categories that require active risk monitoring to be viable at all: institutional custody and staking products, DeFi strategies, tokenised asset funds. Security, in other words, does not just protect the institution, it unlocks the product roadmap.

“The institutions winning in digital assets are the ones that stopped treating security as a compliance checkbox and started treating it as operating infrastructure.”

Gal Sagie,
CEO and co-founder, Hypernative

Why custody is where this belongs

The intelligence Hypernative provides is only as useful as the infrastructure it is connected to. And this is where the relationship between security monitoring and custody infrastructure becomes critical.

Custody is the point in the stack where a transaction is either approved and signed, or it is not. That makes it the only place in the digital asset operating model where security and compliance policy can move from advisory to operational – enforced at the moment of signing, not flagged after the fact.

Pre-transaction screening tells you whether a pool is toxic or a counterparty is non-compliant with internal standards. But that intelligence only prevents an exposure if it is wired into the approval workflow at the exact moment a transaction is about to execute. Without that connection, the controls exist but do not enforce. At the risk tolerance levels regulated institutions operate at, the difference between a warning and a block can be the difference between a near-miss and a reportable incident.

“Individual capabilities, however sophisticated, only reach their full value when they’re integrated into the custody layer. Security monitoring that sits outside custody is advisory. Security monitoring that sits inside custody is operational.”

Anoosh Arevshatian,
Chief Product Officer, Zodia Custody

Where this is heading

The regulatory direction of travel is clear. Frameworks including MiCA and DORA, alongside the evolving expectations of regulators across major markets, are converging on the same requirements: continuous monitoring, real-time risk controls, and demonstrable audit trails are becoming baseline expectations, not differentiators.

Institutions that build these capabilities into their infrastructure now will be better placed as regulatory expectations rise; able to expand their digital asset offerings, support more complex instruments and use cases, and meet scrutiny without rebuilding from scratch.

More significantly, the question of how to secure digital asset operations is increasingly moving up the governance stack. What today sits as a vendor selection decision at the operational level is becoming a risk governance question at the board level. Institutions that treat security as infrastructure, rather than as a feature to be procured separately, will be the ones that earn the institutional due diligence evaluations that the next phase of digital asset adoption requires.

Zodia Solutions and Hypernative share a view of where this ends up: a world where the security and compliance layer is not bolted on to digital asset operations, but built into the foundations. For banks entering this market, that foundation starts with custody.

 

---

 

About Hypernative

Hypernative is a real-time security and compliance platform for institutions operating in digital asset markets. Its technology monitors across the full transaction lifecycle, from pre-transaction screening, and simulation to continuous monitoring and automated response, giving regulated financial institutions the visibility and control they need to operate with confidence in on-chain environments.

About Zodia Solutions

Zodia Solutions is an institutional digital asset infrastructure platform that enables financial institutions to design, deliver and grow digital asset services through trusted, bank-grade technology and infrastructure. With leading global banks among its shareholders, Zodia Solutions supports financial institutions worldwide.

Explore Solutions